Let’s say a compliance platform is worth $12,000 per year. Does that sound like a high price?
It depends on what you’re replacing.
If technology can eliminate hundreds of hours of tedious evidence collection in a complex technology environment, $12,000 could be a wise investment. The calculation would be different in the event that a small group of individuals could gather the same amount of evidence in just the time of a few minutes every month.
That’s a useful method to begin your search for the best Vanta alternative. Start with asking which platform offers the greatest features. Ask your company about how these features will save you time and money.
Automated Manufacturing Comes with a Break-Even Point
Automation of compliance isn’t intrinsically good or bad. The benefits of compliance automation will change as the company expands. Imagine an expanding technology company with multiple cloud environments and various applications. The manual process of gathering evidence can be a major operational burden. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and collect evidence easily justify their expense.
Consider a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2. Imagine a startup with 10 employees in preparation for its first SOC 2.
This is a crucial distinction in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. Although an advanced platform might have a lot of features however, they’re only useful for organizations that are in need of them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both are established compliance platforms built around automation and integrations. As such, comparing their supported frameworks including integrations, service contracts, and individual quotes could be beneficial for companies who are looking for a similar approach.
There’s another choice to make before that. Are you interested in an integration-driven platform for compliance? Certain companies require constant monitoring as well as automated collection of evidence. Others prefer to present evidence by themselves, especially when the amount of work remains minimal.
Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the Same Model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors have a place in the market, with a similar focus on automation. The market also has lighter platforms designed around management rather than comprehensive system connectivity.
CertAssist belongs to the latter category. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors and compliance specialists. It combines framework controls into a central workspace and gives editable guidance on policies as well as evidence. Auditors can review the evidence through a restricted interface.
It doesn’t intend to connect to operational systems nor create infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own evidence if they prefer.
Factor System Access into the Decision
It is obvious that removing integrations can be a disadvantage. One must gather evidence manually.
This also means that integration setup is eliminated and this means that the compliance application does not require standing connections to the organization’s operational environment.
Both architectures are equally good. Which one is appropriate for your company?
CertAssist is targeted at groups of between five and 200 persons. The company publishes its pricing instead of requiring an initial sales call to determine the starting figure. The stated launch price for CertAssist is $225 per monthly instead of a regular $375.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
The needs of a 10-person start-up today might not necessarily match its needs when it has 100 or 500 employees.
A lightweight platform can make sense while compliance remains easy. As employees, systems, frameworks, and evidence requirements grow, the economics will eventually favor deeper automation. Let complexity be the primary factor when you purchase compliance technology.
Do not pay for fifty different integrations just because they look impressive in the comparison chart. You should purchase them only if the cost to do the task by hand is greater.
