Let’s say that a compliance platform is $12,000 per year. Are you paying too much?
It depends on what you’re replacing.
If $12,000 can be used to save hundreds of hours in the repetitive gathering of evidence across the complex technological world, it could be money well invested. The calculation would be different for a start-up of seven people could collect the same amount of evidence in just several minutes each month.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Asking which platform has the greatest features is not the first step. Consider how much time and effort these features will save your company.
Automation is an economic break-even Point
It’s not inherently either good or bad. The importance of automation for compliance will change as the company expands. Imagine a rapidly growing tech company that has hundreds of employees several cloud environments, multiple applications, and frequent access changes. Manually collecting evidence could be a huge operational burden. Integrations that automately monitor systems and gather evidence can justly justify the expense.
Take a look at a startup that has 10 employees in preparation for their first SOC 2. Think about a startup that has 10 employees working on its first SOC 2.
Vanta pricing is based on this variation. A high-end platform can offer large capabilities, but those capabilities deliver financial value only in the event that an organization really requires them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a discussion that can easily become a feature-by-feature exercise. The two platforms are built on automation and integration, so organizations looking for this approach can benefit from comparison of the frameworks that are supported, their integrations and service as well as individual quotations and contracts.
You’ll have to decide on another thing first. Do you need a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Certain businesses want continuous monitoring and automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the same pattern.
A lot of Vanta competitors are in the same category, which focuses on automation. There are also lighter platforms designed around organizing rather than extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors as well as compliance consultants. It organizes controls for frameworks into a central workspace and allows for editing of guidelines for policy and evidence. Auditors are able to review the evidence through a restricted interface.
It doesn’t intend to connect to operational systems, nor does it install infrastructure agents. Customers can upload evidence that they prefer.
The consideration of access to the System in the Decision
It is evident that the removal of integrations will have a disadvantage. It is necessary to collect evidence by hand.
The compliance software does not require any integration and can be used with no permanent connections to the operational environment.
The architectures of either are not superior to each other. Which tradeoff is right for your company?
CertAssist targets teams that have between five and 200 participants. The pricing of the service is announced rather than requiring an initial sales call to determine the first figure. Its official launch price is $225 per month compared with a regular price of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Find Its Place
The requirements for a start-up with a staff of 10 are not necessarily similar to the needs of the company that has 100 or 500 workers.
Compliance can be maintained with an easy platform. The costs of automation will increase as systems, employees and frameworks increase. Let complexity play a role when you purchase compliance technology.
Spending money on fifty integrations just because they look attractive in a comparison table is not a good idea. It is best to pay for them only when the cost to do the task they replace manually is higher.
